16th October 1856
This evening I stood before them once more – those starched collars and pursed mouths arrayed in judgement as if the Heavens themselves had commissioned their verdict. The hall at the Mechanics’ Institute became my arena, and I their reluctant gladiator, compelled to defend what any man with eyes might see: that the fever victims of Narrow-street recovered where the physicians’ bleedings failed them.
Dr. H rose to challenge my methods, his voice thick with the authority of his Edinburgh degree. “Upon what principle,” quoth he, “does an apothecary presume to contradict the settled wisdom of the profession?” The question hung beneath the gaslight like a noose. I answered him plainly – that I have buried fewer patients than he, and that the stars which govern our humours care not for the letters after a man’s name. The assembly stirred. Some few nodded. Most frowned.
It was young T who asked me afterwards, as we stood beneath the cold October sky, which man I accounted truly successful in our calling. The question vexed me, for my thoughts flew immediately to that woman whose name has become synonymous with mercy amongst the returned soldiers – she who walked the wards at Scutari whilst gentlemen physicians remained in their London consulting-rooms. Yet I could not speak her name without seeming to curry favour with the reformists, nor remain silent without appearing churlish.
“Success,” I told him, measuring each word as one measures a draught, “belongs to those whose works outlive the corruption of the flesh. Consider the man who discovers a cure, yet dies penniless and unmourned. Is he less successful than the titled physician who inherits wealth and adds nothing to our knowledge? The celestial spheres keep true account, though earthly men keep false ledgers.”
I spoke thus because I know my own position to be precarious. The Medical Act looms – they say it shall pass within the year – and men such as myself, trained by apprenticeship rather than university, shall find ourselves cast down from our modest elevation. My legacy, such as it may be, exists only in the living bodies of those I have restored to health. No statue shall bear my likeness. No hospital wing shall carry my name. Yet when I walk through Narrow-street, mothers call their children to greet me, and old men doff their caps.
Is that not a constellation of remembrance more enduring than marble?
The night is clear, and through my window I perceive Orion rising in his ancient course. The stars witnessed Galen’s errors and shall witness the correction of our own. They shall burn when the last of us – physician and apothecary, reformer and traditionalist alike – has returned to dust. This thought affords me peculiar comfort. We are small beneath their gaze, and our quarrels smaller still.
Yet I confess I am weary of defending my competence to men who would not recognise a genuinely successful treatment if it restored their own children from the grave. The cholera took seventy souls in this parish last summer, and I lost but three of those who came under my care – not through bleeding or calomel, but through clean water and beef tea and the simple dignity of allowing the body to heal itself when not assaulted by lancet and purge. Dr. H lost a dozen patients, yet he retains his position whilst I must justify my every action before committees of men who have never laid hands upon a fevered brow.
There is a species of success that consists in maintaining one’s place within the established order, asking no difficult questions, challenging no settled opinion. Then there is the success of knowing one has acted rightly, though all the world condemn it. I find myself increasingly drawn toward the latter, though it be the harder path.
The Heavens inscribe our deeds in a ledger more permanent than any earthly record. This I must believe, else what hope remains for those of us who labour in obscurity, who heal without recognition, who shall be forgotten before our graves are green? Let Dr. H have his Royal College and his knighthood. I shall have the knowledge that I did less harm than he, and perhaps – if the celestial accounting be just – that shall weigh more heavily in the final reckoning.
The candle burns low. Tomorrow I must attend to Mrs. W’s child, whose cough has worsened despite her mother’s best efforts. The stars turn in their appointed courses, indifferent to our small struggles, yet somehow I draw strength from their constancy. They remind me that truth is not determined by consensus, nor honour by acclaim.
I shall continue my work, though all the medical establishments of England stand against me.
Mid-Victorian Britain, in the immediate aftermath of the Crimean War (1853-1856), saw public scrutiny of military medicine and growing calls for reform, spurred by reports of mismanagement and high mortality among soldiers. Civilian health crises, notably recurrent cholera outbreaks, intensified debate over sanitation and treatment, with figures like John Snow challenging miasma theory and advocating waterborne explanations. Professional regulation tightened with the Medical Act of 1858, which created the General Medical Council and a formal Medical Register, reshaping the status of apothecaries, surgeons, and physicians. Subsequent reforms – expanding sanitary infrastructure, hospital organisation, and nursing – helped reduce urban mortality and professionalised British medical practice.
Bob Lynn | © 2025 Vox Meditantis. All rights reserved. | 🌐 Translate
Vox Meditantis 
Leave a comment